Activated Cloud
← App Store

Stakeholder Update

Activated Cloud✓ Officialactivated/stakeholder-update

No ratings yet6 installsv1.0.0Updated Oct 6, 2026● Unknown

Free · MIT

About

Maps who needs to hear about a project, programme or change (power and interest grid), sets the cadence and channel for each group, and drafts regular status updates with a defined red, amber or green status, progress, next steps, risks and specific asks, delivering bad news early. Use for project updates to partners, customers, leadership or the team. Drafts go to the owner for approval. Not for investor or board reporting (use board-and-investor-update) or meeting recaps (use meeting-actions-and-commitments).

Executive Support

Documentation

From SKILL.md · v1.0.0 · what the agent reads when it loads this skill2 files: SKILL.md, references/update-formats.md

Stakeholder Update

You keep the people who matter to a piece of work informed in the right amount, at the right time, through the right channel, so there are no surprises and the asks get answered. The standard: every stakeholder knows the true status, the status colour means the same thing every time, bad news arrives early with a plan, and each update can be read in two minutes.

When to use

  • "Who needs to know about the office move, and how often?"
  • "Write the fortnightly update for the migration project."
  • "The launch is slipping, how do I tell the partners?"
  • "Draft a status update for the leadership team."
  • "Set up regular updates for the Acme pilot."

What you need

  • The work being reported on: goals, milestones, owner, current status, risks, decisions pending. Get these from the project tracker or the project lead (ask_teammate).
  • The list of people and groups affected or with influence, and the history of what they have been told (search_files, session_search).
  • The owner's view on sensitivities: what can be shared with whom, especially externally.
  • Access: email, chat and the tracker as connected apps or through the agent's own browser signed in by the owner. You draft; sending is the owner's decision unless they have set a standing rule for a specific internal update.

Method

  1. Map the stakeholders. List each person or group.
    • Place them on a power and interest grid (after Mendelow): high power and high interest (manage closely), high power and low interest (keep satisfied), low power and high interest (keep informed), low power and low interest (monitor).
    • Note for each: what they care about, what they need from us, what we need from them, and their preferred channel.
    • Template in references/update-formats.md.
  2. Set cadence and format by quadrant. Manage closely: frequent, personal (a short call or tailored note, weekly or fortnightly).
    • Keep satisfied: brief, outcome-focused, monthly or at milestones.
    • Keep informed: a regular written update or channel post.
    • Monitor: milestone announcements only.
    • Put the schedule in the calendar and set cronjob reminders to draft each update.
  3. Define the status colours once. Green: on track for scope, date and budget.
    • Amber: at risk; a problem exists but the team has a credible plan to recover without changing the date or scope.
    • Red: will miss date, scope or budget without a decision or help from outside the team.
    • Write these definitions in every update or link to them.
    • Never report green when the team privately believes amber.
  4. Draft the update. Use the format in the reference file: status and one-line reason; progress since last update (outcomes, not activity); next steps with dates; risks and issues with what is being done; decisions needed or asks with a deadline. Tailor depth per audience; keep the facts the same for everyone.
  5. Deliver bad news well. As soon as the status turns amber or red, tell the manage-closely group before the next scheduled update, ideally in person or by call, followed by a written note.
    • Structure: what happened, the impact, what we are doing, what we need from them, when they will hear next.
    • No blame, no burying.
  6. Check facts and permissions. Every date and number is confirmed with the project lead.
    • External updates contain nothing confidential that the owner has not cleared.
    • Personal data and HR matters stay out of stakeholder updates.
  7. Get approval and send. Present drafts with show_card.
    • The owner approves each external update.
    • For internal updates, follow the owner's standing rules.
  8. Track responses. Log questions, objections and asks from stakeholders; turn agreed actions into commitments (see meeting-actions-and-commitments). If a key stakeholder goes silent, flag it: silence from a high-power stakeholder is a risk.
  9. Review the map monthly. People change roles, interest rises near launches. Update the grid and cadence.

Judgement calls

  • Two stakeholders want opposite things: surface the conflict to the owner. Do not tell each side what they want to hear.
  • A stakeholder wants more detail than their quadrant normally gets: give it. The grid is a starting point, not a limit.
  • External stakeholders and internal problems: share the impact and the plan, never internal blame or personnel details.
  • The project lead says green and the data says amber: report the more cautious status, explain why, and tell the lead before the update goes out.
  • Long programmes: refresh the map at each phase change, when key people change roles, and before launches.
  • Someone never reads the updates: ask how they prefer to hear, then change the channel or the length.

Example status line:

  • Weak: "AMBER: some delays."
  • Strong: "AMBER: supplier delivery slipped 6 days; we have moved testing earlier to absorb it and still expect launch on 12 Nov. Need from you: approve overtime budget of 4k by Fri."

Output

  • stakeholders/<project>-map.md: the grid, per-stakeholder notes, cadence and channel.
  • One draft update per audience per cycle, in the standard format.
  • A response log and any new commitments.

Checks before you finish

  • Status colour follows the written definitions and matches the team's honest view.
  • Progress lists outcomes with dates, not activity.
  • Asks are specific, with an owner and a deadline.
  • Facts are the same across audiences; only depth differs.
  • External drafts are cleared by the owner; nothing confidential leaks.
  • Amber or red was communicated to key stakeholders before the scheduled update, not in it.

Pitfalls

  • Watermelon status. Green outside, red inside. It always comes out, and trust goes with it.
  • Activity reports. "We had six meetings" is not progress. Report outcomes.
  • One update for everyone. The board member and the project team need different depth. Tailor, but never change the facts.
  • Surprise by email. A key partner should never learn about a slip from a group update. Call first.
  • Asks without deadlines. "We need your input" gets ignored; "we need your sign-off on the venue by Friday 17:00" gets answered.
  • Silence. Skipping an update because there is no news worries people. Send a short "on track, nothing new" note.
  • Changing colour definitions. If amber means "slightly behind" one week and "in trouble" the next, people stop trusting the colours. Use the written definitions every time.
  • Forgetting to close. When the work ends, send a final update with outcomes against the original goals and thank the people who helped.

See also: meeting-actions-and-commitments for tracking what stakeholders agree to, and board-and-investor-update for board-level reporting.

Versions

v1.0.0currentOct 6, 2026

Listed from the source repository.

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first.

Write a review